View Single Post
Old January 12, 2013, 02:24 PM   #24
musher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2005
Posts: 462
You may be right about the reality and the interpretation, but I would ask if a violation of 265.02 (2) requires as an element the violation of 265.01 (1) or (2) or (3) or (5)

Perhaps Dove is right in suggesting that possession in this statute means something like "possession of unregistered firearms".

Perhaps there is a definitions paragraph somewhere in this section that clarifies this.
musher is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02577 seconds with 8 queries