The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

doofus47 · March 15, 2013, 11:29 AM

The fact that gun-control issues didn't come up as a ballot issue tells me that the faction that would like to see firearms controlled didn't think that would pass majority muster.

There will be a super-media blitz from out of state to fight a ballot initiative, but screw 'em. Make em spend it all. I say leave off the sb195 (no ccl w/out some face to face training) and the idea of repealing useless laws seems pretty "common sense." Fighting a misinformation blizzard about sb195 to explain why people should be able to get a ccw w/out ever having to see an instructor in person is going to be an uphill battle and will lose votes in my opinion. Personally, I like the idea of CCW training having some face to face portion. If you care enough, you'll show up.

March 15, 2013, 11:29 AM	#12
doofus47 Senior Member Join Date: June 9, 2010 Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent Posts: 2,483	The fact that gun-control issues didn't come up as a ballot issue tells me that the faction that would like to see firearms controlled didn't think that would pass majority muster. There will be a super-media blitz from out of state to fight a ballot initiative, but screw 'em. Make em spend it all. I say leave off the sb195 (no ccl w/out some face to face training) and the idea of repealing useless laws seems pretty "common sense." Fighting a misinformation blizzard about sb195 to explain why people should be able to get a ccw w/out ever having to see an instructor in person is going to be an uphill battle and will lose votes in my opinion. Personally, I like the idea of CCW training having some face to face portion. If you care enough, you'll show up. __________________ I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time.