Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Naught Spy
.
When the claim is made that something is more accurate than the previous design, I would expect some less questionable documentation, LOL.
They posted their results and they didn't look superior to the results of folks shooting older Glocks at the same distance.
|
It’s not the same people shooting or measuring the groups you’re comparing. You’re comparing a writer-chosen, 3 shot group from a Ransom Rest to a series of fourteen 5 shot groups from a sandbag. I don’t know that I consider that apples to apples.
It’s a third party website as well, not Glock themselves. I’m not sure a third party website owes anyone any kind of “documentation” when they make a statement about a certain action type in general. This was what the article stated :
“By the way, rotary action pistols are said to be more accurate, since the barrel does not tilt or moves back as with the Browning-SIG-Petter system, but only performs a rotating motion.”
I don’t personally read that statement as a claim that this pistol will be definitively more accurate than Glock’s existing designs. Seems more like a hypothesis.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk