The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

TruthTellers · December 31, 2017, 05:10 PM

I too think that it would be legally categorized as an SBR. The ATF's Sig brace ruling is about the brace only, not modifications to the brace.

I wouldn't SBR, it's costly, takes time, difficult to re-sell or bequeath to kin after death.

They make braces now that are adjustable. You could look at those and see if it would work for you.

December 31, 2017, 05:10 PM	#5
TruthTellers Senior Member Join Date: October 22, 2016 Posts: 3,888	I too think that it would be legally categorized as an SBR. The ATF's Sig brace ruling is about the brace only, not modifications to the brace. I wouldn't SBR, it's costly, takes time, difficult to re-sell or bequeath to kin after death. They make braces now that are adjustable. You could look at those and see if it would work for you. __________________ "We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."