I don't see anything particularly troubling in there.
Guns may be regulated. That is a fact and should be obvious.
There is not and should not be completely unrestricted access to all manner of "guns".
I do believe that law-abiding citizens should have access to a vast array of powerful and completely unneccesary weapons.
However, those weapons are and should be "regulated".
Scalia simply says that guns are and should be regulated. He's right.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives...
...they just don't plan not to.
-Andy Stanley
|