View Single Post
Old February 18, 2022, 06:33 PM   #33
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,298
Quote:
The CN Supreme Court re-instated the suit, Under their ruling, the case should not have been dismissed but should have its day in court and the jury would decide if there was any validity to the claim.
Is this not precedent ? Can't CN courts now use that ruling to force new cases to move forward ? In fact if it is local precedent they MUST allow the cases to go forward correct ?

Does anyone have a link to that ruling ? I'd like to see how the judge/s concluded the marketing ( which ever was claimed to be the offending add ) had merit and how it side stepped PLCAA law ?
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !

I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
Metal god is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.06490 seconds with 8 queries