|
somebody correct me if I'm wrong, I always thought the reason police have certain immunity is because they are required to be there where citizens are not? To me that's a huge difference in accepting liabilities. This is notwithstanding cases where an armed citizen has no choice but to defend his life but in the course accidentally shoots the wrong person. I do wish there was a way to put all that liability on the bad guy who caused it but that gets complicated...
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2
|