Quote:
Bob knows he is a bad shot. Everyone at the range makes jokes about the seeing eye dog he doesn't have. He is at a baseball game, and Bob acts within his right of self defense in employing deadly force against Gaige also inadvertently but carelessly shooting seven other people who weren't involved in the conflict.
Bob didn't intend to hit any of the seven other people. Isn't Bob a potential tortfeasor against whom any of the seven should be able to seek damages?
|
You keep trotting out this straw man. No one is arguing against this.
It does not advance the discussion at all.