View Single Post
Old June 29, 2010, 12:09 PM   #55
Wildalaska
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
Quote:
Since the challenger will always argue a failure to meet that standard, the burden is effectively shifted to the state.
Zuk, it's more though than just screeching "unconstitutional", the plaintiff must set forth some facts to shift that burden.

I was sort of hoping folks would do something like.....yeah maybe take a look at the legislative history of the Federal AWB and provide me with some articulable reason to conclude a cosmetic AWB would fail under Heller.

Instead we get the veiled ad hominems. Ce la vie

WildsaidtheoldfolksitgoestoshowyounevercantellAlaska TM
Wildalaska is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03381 seconds with 8 queries