I'm notorious for rambling to make a succinct point. I'm hoping to make an exception to the rule (especially in a thread like this).
Here's my view on "absolute" however hypocritical:
I believe our Constitutional rights are an absolute as long as my neighbor isn't harmed by my actions. If someone chooses to buy and keep 5000 ARs after a ban is placed on them, for example, I see no problem. The so called "law" is null and void by what the Constitution simply states. That person isn't doing anything to hurt me by simply owning those firearms.
|