View Single Post
Old September 24, 2007, 01:34 PM   #38
David Armstrong
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
Quote:
I understand your thought and agree to a point but my feeling is that the decision to take a life must be of such importance that whether or not it is legal should not matter.
And I would take the other position, that taking a life is of such importance that whether one's action is legal or not should be near paramount in your thoughts.
Quote:
If someone breaks into your house at 3:00 a.m. with a gun and threatens you and your family are you really going to be concerned about whether or not your state supports the castle doctrine?
No, because that is irrelevant. I know it is irrelevant because I am aware of the legal considerations present in such a case.
Quote:
When choosing to fire you must make the decision based on your physical protection rather than your legal protection.
And determining how to make that choice is based as much on legal issues as anything else. Is force authorized in this type of situation? How much force can I use to ensure outcome "A", and so on. My $.02.
David Armstrong is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03055 seconds with 8 queries