The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - .22 Buckmark, Ruger Mk II and III; 22/45 or S&W .22 A1?

Pilot · September 24, 2012, 08:36 AM

I prefer the Ruger MK II. I have three of them, and a MK II era 22/45 (similar gun with polymer frame, and 1911 grip angle). They are very accurate, reliable, and built like tanks. They will outlast you.

The Ruger MK III's are similar but have a few negative features that were added due to liability issues, and CA requirements. Loaded chamber indicator, and mag disconnect. If yu can find a used MK II get that. If you can't find a MK II, the MK III's can be modded to get rid of that stuff.

The Browning Buckmark would be my second choice, but somre prefer them over the Ruger.

September 24, 2012, 08:36 AM	#11
Pilot Senior Member Join Date: December 21, 2000 Posts: 4,193	I prefer the Ruger MK II. I have three of them, and a MK II era 22/45 (similar gun with polymer frame, and 1911 grip angle). They are very accurate, reliable, and built like tanks. They will outlast you. The Ruger MK III's are similar but have a few negative features that were added due to liability issues, and CA requirements. Loaded chamber indicator, and mag disconnect. If yu can find a used MK II get that. If you can't find a MK II, the MK III's can be modded to get rid of that stuff. The Browning Buckmark would be my second choice, but somre prefer them over the Ruger. __________________ Pilot