|
C'mon. I'm making a simple point that you seem to be okay with some types of infringement, while using the phrase "shall not infringe" like it is limitless.
Either 2a can be infringed for very good reason, or it cannot and creates situations where people accused, incarcerated, but not convicted should be able keep their arms on them.
Do you support that infringement or not? Why or why not? How do you write a law the prevents certain people (or any people, for that matter) from being armed if there is such a thing as a truly uninfringeable, universal right?
|