View Single Post
Old May 12, 2009, 08:26 AM   #10
buzz_knox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,190
Quote:
So a "dangerous" weapon would be one that does not discriminate what it destroys.

That's probably as reasonable a definition as we will see.
A bullet doesn't discriminate what it destroys, so that definition makes it a dangerous weapon.

If you are trying to exclude area effect weapons, that definition doesn't work because it applies to everything except humans themselves.

How about "a weapon which cannot be used in its normal manner without posing undue risk of collateral damage?"
buzz_knox is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04173 seconds with 8 queries