Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MLeake
Meanwhile, I haven't seen this raised anywhere, and it may not have been a factor - but something else to consider: People are saying she shouldn't have gone back in and put the kids at risk. But she had just been assaulted by the father; what if she thought he posed a risk to the kids, in his present state? Would people then say she should not have re-entered the home?
|
It's a thought, but I don't think it's a persuasive argument. Consider the way it was reported in the article:
Quote:
|
She testified that she went back into the house, where Gray was with his two sons, and fired the shot.
|
This tells me that the kids were not HER kids -- and the article doesn't tell us how old the "kids" were. The husband was 36 years old -- that's old enough for the "kids" to be adults.