I just got to thinking that the order does not say all statutes . This leads me to believe the state can pick and choose which ones they want to use . Meaning leaving out laws that were repealed or found unconstitutional that may contradict the laws they include .
This would require the plaintiffs to find those contradictory statues them selves ? Is that how others are reading this order ?
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !
I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
Last edited by Metal god; December 15, 2022 at 07:09 PM.
|