View Single Post
Old April 30, 2013, 09:14 AM   #523
Al Norris
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,610
Chuck, it really depends upon what the actual intent of the Court is. They could GVR Woollard after a decision in Moore, or they could take Woollard and decide the issue of carry.

I see the Court taking Moore as the first step in issue of carry: Is it or is it not part and parcel of the right to self defense? A decision here, might include some hints on how to proceed with may issue/shall issue cases. That would mean a GVR.

Percolate the question with the cases already in the pipe for a couple more years before they decide to actually take another case. Past actions would indicate this route.

Mack, I suspect you are correct in how IL politics is being played out.
Al Norris is offline  
Page generated in 0.05238 seconds with 8 queries