The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - Considering variable vs. fixed power scope

ronl · November 28, 2013, 02:34 AM

I have a friend who has the Burris MTAC and it seems to be a decent optic. I like a 1-4 on an AR as it really enhances the usefulness of the platform. I chose a Horus Vision Talon because of the clarity and the reticle, which allows for really precise shooting out to 500 yds. IMHO, the H-50 reticle is the best out there as far as a 1-4 optic is concerned. The only negative is the price as compared to the Burris/Vortex PST's, from $600-650. As to the fixed power scopes, they do have their place. I have an SWFA SS 10x42 on an M1A and it is a great match. The scope is simple, effective, and rugged. That being said, such an optic on an AR platform would render it useless in CQB situations without canted irons or a small red-dot, which adds more weight. The 1-4 is the best solution to the problem and effectively extends the range of a good AR.

November 28, 2013, 02:34 AM	#10
ronl Senior Member Join Date: December 2, 2007 Posts: 1,100	I have a friend who has the Burris MTAC and it seems to be a decent optic. I like a 1-4 on an AR as it really enhances the usefulness of the platform. I chose a Horus Vision Talon because of the clarity and the reticle, which allows for really precise shooting out to 500 yds. IMHO, the H-50 reticle is the best out there as far as a 1-4 optic is concerned. The only negative is the price as compared to the Burris/Vortex PST's, from $600-650. As to the fixed power scopes, they do have their place. I have an SWFA SS 10x42 on an M1A and it is a great match. The scope is simple, effective, and rugged. That being said, such an optic on an AR platform would render it useless in CQB situations without canted irons or a small red-dot, which adds more weight. The 1-4 is the best solution to the problem and effectively extends the range of a good AR.