The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - We just won Palmer at the DC District Court!

Jim March · July 28, 2014, 02:53 AM

NO, Tom, you've got it very wrong.

Why?

Because the court already accepted as fact that non-DC people can't register jack, and then the court told DC they could not discriminate against non-DC people.

This court read the US Supreme court correctly for a change in Saenz v. Roe (1999) and Ward v. Maryland (1870).

Forcing non-DC people to show a card WE CANNOT GET would violate the order.

July 28, 2014, 02:53 AM	#29
Jim March Senior Member Join Date: February 14, 1999 Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA Posts: 7,417	NO, Tom, you've got it very wrong. Why? Because the court already accepted as fact that non-DC people can't register jack, and then the court told DC they could not discriminate against non-DC people. This court read the US Supreme court correctly for a change in Saenz v. Roe (1999) and Ward v. Maryland (1870). Forcing non-DC people to show a card WE CANNOT GET would violate the order. __________________ Jim March