The 'sua sponte' date is March 6, says one of the Michel and Associates lawyers (Peruta's lawyers).
Cannot even guess the likelihood of one judge asking for the rehearing, nor whether 9th would vote to do it.
Note also this, from Sheriff Gore's letter to the Supervisors:
Quote:
|
... Additionally, the Ninth Circuit went on to emphasize that "nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession '—or carriage—' of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”
|
California law (PC 26200) allows an issuing agency to add reasonable restrictions:
Quote:
(a) A license issued pursuant to this article may include
any reasonable restrictions or conditions that the issuing authority
deems warranted, including restrictions as to the time, place,
manner, and circumstances under which the licensee may carry a
pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon
the person.
(b) Any restrictions imposed pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be
indicated on any license issued.
|
Marking licenses 'not valid on school property', for example, is a legal and sometimes used restriction.