|
Once bear is firmly established outside the home, I'm hoping this particularly transparent and bald-faced abuse of the commerce clause will finally be vulnerable to a challenge. Whatever the scope of the commerce clause, it is doubtful that it was ever intended to obliterate a fundamental unenumerated right.
Al, I have never heard the argument "once in commerce, always in commerce." That's absurd on its face. I would love to hear Gura shred that to pieces someday.
Also, wasn't there some speculation that Justice Roberts planted a poison pill for the commerce clause in the Obamacare ruling? Does anybody know whether that may be relevant in the future with regard to gun free school zones?
|