View Single Post
Old March 25, 1999, 01:20 AM   #15
Ed
Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Geogia, USA
Posts: 85
Jim - You sound as though you have been stuffing .45's for quite a few years. I started reloading in 1960, but didn't get a .45 until '62.

I also tend to think the case headspaces on the chamber shoulder. I use a taper crimp die, and I can drop a loaded case into a disassembled barrel and it stops with a clunk against the shoulder. In my guns there is a fairly large gap between the hook and the breech block face. Seems to me the case would stretch a lot if it headspaced on that hook and the case gripped the chamber wall under pressure. On second thought, I 'm not sure there's enough pressure there for the case to grip the chamber wall like in a centerfire rifle, so my whole theory may be wrong. Offhand, I can't think of any way to prove it one way or the other. I don't suppose it really matters as long as you get decent accuracy and reliable functioning, which I do.

The taper crimp makes a big difference in functional reliability in the old Colt I have. The newer 1911-A1 was pretty good anyway on that point, so I don't see much difference with it. Before I got the taper crimp die I couldn't get a tight enough crimp to keep bullets from creeping under recoil in a mod.1950 Smith .45ACP revolver unless I seated them out far enough to roll a crimp into the top lube groove. Same thing happened with .45ACP bullets (no crimp groove) in .45 Long Colt cases for a Ruger SA. Now I can seat the bullets in properly and they don't move. For me, taper crimping is well worth the little extra time and trouble.
Ed is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03515 seconds with 8 queries