|
Bob Herinomous who claimed to be the guy in the suit has been discredited. Which story of his do you believe? That Patterson made the suit out of horse hair or the version where he says that Patterson bought the suit? He even names the company that Patterson allegedly bought the suit from except that the company never sold a suit like the one Bob described.
How about his claim that Patterson let he keep the suit for awhile and he drove around with it in full view on his back seat right after the film was taken? His story doesn't add up. He is also not the first person to have claimed to have been the man in the suit. Pretty easy to make up stuff now when Patterson has been dead since '72.
If Patterson could buy a suit like that, why didn't they use them in 2001 a Space Odyessy? "Bigfoot" looked more "real" than those apes.
John Chambers, one of the premier special fx guys in the '60's said he could not duplicate what is in the Patterson film. The Disney fx team also said that they could not duplicate it.
The Discovery Channel did a re-enactment at the very same spot in the late '90's, early 2000's, using the best suit they could come up with etc. Doesn't look half as real as the Patterson film.
This all proves my point. If anyone takes a pic of it, so what? It will prove nothing. You'll be called a kook or a hoaxster. The Patterson film is about as good of quality as you are going to get and people don't believe it. Short of Marty Stauffer coming across one with his super duper camera equipment that costs more than most peoples cars and weighs about as much. The only thing folks will believe is seeing the actual body.
|