The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

brentfoto · May 1, 2008, 03:01 PM

As new owner of a Kahr CW9, I am offended about the remark about the Kahr. This is just blatantly stated, without any supporting evidence. Everything I've heard or read is that Kahr is frequent selection as a BUG by LEO. If the poster's comments are specifically limited to the PM9, that changes the scenario.

I actually prefer the Kahr CW9 over the J-frame, so that's saying something!
However, as a BUG, I would select the J-frame over the Kahr, because the Kahr would be my primary!

I don't carry a bug anyway. The only advantage my 442 may have over my Kahr CW9 is that it's more concealable. In all other respects, the Kahr wins out handily. I'm not concerned about reliability differences between the two. I hope this puts the poster 'Maggieeeeeyahr' in his place!

May 1, 2008, 03:01 PM	#19
brentfoto Senior Member Join Date: August 20, 2007 Location: SoCal Posts: 362	As new owner of a Kahr CW9, I am offended about the remark about the Kahr. This is just blatantly stated, without any supporting evidence. Everything I've heard or read is that Kahr is frequent selection as a BUG by LEO. If the poster's comments are specifically limited to the PM9, that changes the scenario. I actually prefer the Kahr CW9 over the J-frame, so that's saying something! However, as a BUG, I would select the J-frame over the Kahr, because the Kahr would be my primary! I don't carry a bug anyway. The only advantage my 442 may have over my Kahr CW9 is that it's more concealable. In all other respects, the Kahr wins out handily. I'm not concerned about reliability differences between the two. I hope this puts the poster 'Maggieeeeeyahr' in his place!