View Single Post
Old November 27, 2019, 09:01 AM   #4
American Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 21, 2018
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 AMP View Post
I consider myself a knowledgeable firearms owner, and I disagree.

There is nothing petty about it, and they clearly are not completely ignorant of firearms technology.

I've heard there is an old saying among sharks that goes something like this.
"pointing to the mud on someone else's fins will not improve your own swimming"...

and this is a similar thing. Attacking the morals or ethics of the people proposing these laws does not help us, and may, in fact reduce the impact of your message. " Petty, vindictive", "Bought and paid for", and even "ignorant" are personal opinions, could be considered personal attacks, and are best left out of our responses to..well..everything these people say and do.

If you have actual PROOF, brother, trot it out for the world to see, but if you don't, don't claim things about other people you cannot prove. That's one of their favorite tactics and if we become them, even if we win, we lose.

Welcome to the 21st century, where some people want to make you a felon for possessing a totally inert lump of plastic in a shape they disapprove of... or a spring loaded metal box larger than they think should be allowed...
The proof is there incessant attack on firearms and law abiding citizens.

Is this intended to stop some criminal from waking up and starting their day of crime?

Answer that question.

Do liberals really care about crime and violence? I say no. And their actions prove it. They don't enable people to protect themselves and they don't provide each citizen with their own personal cop. So without a personal cop, how would you advise someone to defend themselves? Maybe get a firearm? I'd advise that. My mother has an AR15... she has been a law abiding citizen her whole life. She is in her 70s. So now, with the wisdom and vindictiveness of the ANTI 2A liberal democrats socialists, they are coming up with a plan to take away her equalizer... they are trying to take away her ability to protect herself from multiple home defenders. That is logical? That is not vindictive? So who is it helping? I'll answer that: The Criminals... they are the only ones helped with this illogical anti 2A ideology. I grew up in Brooklyn and Queens and although I didn't write a thesis and have it published as some kind of Proof, I have made my own correlations of why the places i used to live are a Man Caused Disaster as compared to the Heaven Like place I live now. And it is all based on how they socially engineer laws and policies to protect the criminals and make the law abiding citizen think twice about everything... and if the law abiding don't think correctly, they have a plan for that. And in the meantime, not one criminal loses a bit of sleep over it.

Since you seem to think these laws are logical and are not out of vindictiveness, tell me what you think the goals of these laws are? Explain the logic please.
American Man is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02468 seconds with 8 queries