|
The fact that the responding Sheriff department did not seem to commit to using force quickly in an effort to stop a poosibly ongoing violent attack seems to me to be a strong argument to protect and expand the individual right of self defense. Those who did commit to attempting to get to the shooter and died heroically were, by law, disarmed. I wonder how many lives it may have cost. If the argument that you never know how you will react is true then it’s an argument for more individuals to be armed so that we have spread out the risk of one individual freezing up or retreating
|