View Single Post
Old January 14, 2008, 02:28 AM   #6
Neophyte
Member
 
Join Date: October 31, 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 26
I don't see the point:

if the penetration of the ball is needed (due to distance or what have you), then the #1 buck won't penetrate enough and is useless;

if the #1 buck is adequate (as it would be at most in-house ranges), then the heavy ball is slug-like overkill, and it would make more sense to have additional #1 buckshot in its place (which create multiple wound channels and thus a higher chance of hitting a vital spot)

Seems like a solution in search of a problem to me.
Neophyte is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03360 seconds with 8 queries