Quote:
|
Yes, a ConCon would be an utter disaster. More than likely to result in separate nations than one unified nation.
|
Do you really think so? That 75% hurdle makes me believe it's more likely to end up being an extremely long debate that results in a whole lot of nothing. A couple months of news coverage, then a couple months of sporadic coverage, finished off by a couple months of calls to quit wasting tax revenue on a con-con that isn't getting anything done. You wouldn't see secession, or anything else get over that hurdle would you?