The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

weblance · January 17, 2013, 01:42 PM

I have a Mark II Target I bought new in 89. I also have 3 new, 2012 vintage 22/45s. The triggers on all 3 of the 22/45s were much heavier than the Mark II. This might have been because of the magazine disconnect, but heavier none the less. I removed the mag disco on all 3, and at the same time, installed improved hammer and sear parts. Now the triggers are equal to the stock Mark II.

I agree, the Neos pistol has a look that turns many buyers off, but I do like it. It is a very functional pistol, and the fact that the pistol has a built in rail really sells it for me. The only thing I wish Beretta would now offer is a threaded barrel Neos, or a threaded barrel thru parts.

January 17, 2013, 01:42 PM	#5
weblance Senior Member Join Date: October 3, 2012 Posts: 1,229	I have a Mark II Target I bought new in 89. I also have 3 new, 2012 vintage 22/45s. The triggers on all 3 of the 22/45s were much heavier than the Mark II. This might have been because of the magazine disconnect, but heavier none the less. I removed the mag disco on all 3, and at the same time, installed improved hammer and sear parts. Now the triggers are equal to the stock Mark II. I agree, the Neos pistol has a look that turns many buyers off, but I do like it. It is a very functional pistol, and the fact that the pistol has a built in rail really sells it for me. The only thing I wish Beretta would now offer is a threaded barrel Neos, or a threaded barrel thru parts.