View Single Post
Old March 30, 2002, 08:42 PM   #9
Carbon_15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2001
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 938
probly the rudest e-mail I have ever receaved. He didnt seem to get the idea that my interest in such a round is as a TARGET SHOOTER/PLINKER. I'm not the least bit interested in how well it penetrates steel or kevlar.
I really cant follow what he ment, but I think he is saying that since I dont know everything about restricted "elite" (whatever that means) military-only material, that my validity as a researcher of terminal ballistics or commercial handgun loads is invalid...HUH??

As you read this e-mail rember that this joker is developing future equipment for the govenment..on our dime evidently. He actualy said that the 5.56 Nato has "no potential to be a dangerous caliber" but the .224 BOZ (a handgun case necked down to 5.56 caliber) beats anything hands down. I think they need better ventelation at their shop
Attached Images
File Type: jpg reply.jpg (141.6 KB, 73 views)
__________________
Molon Labe

http://carolinashootersforum.com/index.php
Carbon_15 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02881 seconds with 9 queries