http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/45th_In...(United_States)
A set of Works by Rudyard Kipling, about 1917, was decorated with a swastika inside and out, his son was killed while fighting in WW1 with the Irish Guards in the Battle of Loos which he wrote about in The Irish Guards in the Great War (1923).
Then there was a very bad day, the swastika was blamed, it should make all aware of the responsibility of perception,
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/n.../police_5.html
The article says he refused to move a refrigerator (with all that bulk? Does not add-up), and the request came from a lady, who does not want to display skill and strength for the ladies? No where in the article does it say he was in charge, the person in charge would refuse the request to move the refrigerator if the request was not on the work order*, then the complaint came to the office, when the crew returned to the warehouse Fred was suspended, to make the complaining company happy? Not a word from the complaining company but the decision to suspend 'the illustrated man' instead of the person in charge of the crew, in my opinion, screams as the FACTOR, not the collection.
*send a work order for 'X' amount of work, once the work is done we can get 'X' amount free, after all no extra travel time and the crew is already on the job. This works sometimes, but when the answer is 'no' no must be accepted when asking for something free. If Fred was as bad as they claim he should have been instructed not to answer questions but to refer all inquiries to the 'crew' boss. Did the crew boss say 'NO, I need a work order'.
The crew returns, Oh Yea! we dropped a refigerator down the stairs, lot a damage, rails, stairs, floor, desk and people, lots of people. Answer: Refigerator!!!? You moved a refigerator!!!!? Where on this work order does it say refigerator!!!!? You move a refigerator we want to get paid for moving a refigerator!
F. Guffey