I guess the NJ judge is NOT referring to the current 9th Circuit ruling on Peruta, to say "upholding "good cause" requirement".
That is not what the 9th said, other than good cause is personal self-defense.
Not to be petty, but if on SCOTUS I would grant cert for the chance to torture the judge as badly as he tortured the words of the 9th majority. An insulting leap of illogical thought.
__________________
Loyalty to petrified opinions never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul in this world — and never will.
— Mark Twain
|