Even with good pictures it may not be possible to positively identify. Markings can be, and have been faked.
There have been a few aftermarket magazine makers who have done Luger magazines.
Even good pics might not be enough. With things like this, in order to be honest, I have to take the "lab tech's testimony" as my out.
And what I mean by that is the testimony usually given by "experts" almost never flatly states what is. They state what their results "are consistent with".
Which is not
exactly the same thing.