Well I feel I should say , "I was wrong" . I thought for sure she would not get a vote before the election . I don't think she's going to be a Roberts type , meaning making thing up that aren't there like a tax rather then a mandate . I do believe both political sides will be surprised at times on how she will vote .
Next question is , what cases can she be a part of ? Does she need to be sworn in and be part of a hearing from the beginning or can she simply look through and read up on a current case that has been heard but not yet ruled on and be a part of that ruling ?
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !
I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
|