|
We should also recognize that anytime a court strikes down a law, there is almost always a stay granted to preserve the status quo, while the governing body rewrites its law to be compliant with the court order.
DC has two choices here. They can comply with the Court by writing a law (like IL), or they can appeal the decision.
The court has indicated that if they fail to comply, the court doesn't believe they have any merits that the appeals court will reverse on. Hence the footnote #2, which is also an indication that DC will not get its requested 180 stay.
The Judge is telling DC to tread lightly, and go one way or the other.
|