View Single Post
Old November 24, 2013, 08:30 PM   #77
bricz75
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2012
Posts: 297
Quote:
The switch back to .45 Long Colt did not produce better results. It was not a problem of ballistics, but rather one of poor shot placement and very determined adversaries, using a primitive form of body armor.

Did either the .38 or .45 penetrate that body armor? What was the velocity/ft./lbs. of .45LC in those days?
bricz75 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02636 seconds with 8 queries