View Single Post
Old June 11, 2009, 07:10 PM   #49
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2006
Posts: 1,310
In voir dire, no potential jurist will be allowed onto the panel that is against self defense in principle. Therefore, no anti's will be on the jury unless they lie to get there.

The question here is whether or not the second set of shots were legal. Anyone who believes that neither set of shots should have happened because the pharmacist should not have had a gun will be dismissed for cause.
Caveat Emperor
divemedic is offline  
Page generated in 0.03327 seconds with 8 queries