The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

CharlieDeltaJuliet · June 13, 2013, 08:14 PM

I agree 100% tahunua001. But I still think the Hk can hold its own.... I agree though about mil-spec.

And TheBeardedGuy, I never said they were the boogeyman. They (DI guns) honestly are more dependable than most will ever need. I believe you about the SF guy. I have seen a Colt go over 50k rounds on all original equipment. There was a big write up about it. I shoot my DI guns as much as my Hk. It the past 12 years or so I have put over 25k rounds through AR's. I have around 4k through my Hk (ammo went up too much to replace as easy). As I was saying I just believe the Hk and LWRC are better AR's than DI AR's. Just my opinion.

June 13, 2013, 08:14 PM	#41
CharlieDeltaJuliet Senior Member Join Date: July 25, 2012 Posts: 755	I agree 100% tahunua001. But I still think the Hk can hold its own.... I agree though about mil-spec. And TheBeardedGuy, I never said they were the boogeyman. They (DI guns) honestly are more dependable than most will ever need. I believe you about the SF guy. I have seen a Colt go over 50k rounds on all original equipment. There was a big write up about it. I shoot my DI guns as much as my Hk. It the past 12 years or so I have put over 25k rounds through AR's. I have around 4k through my Hk (ammo went up too much to replace as easy). As I was saying I just believe the Hk and LWRC are better AR's than DI AR's. Just my opinion. __________________ " The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government...." - Thomas Jefferson Last edited by CharlieDeltaJuliet; June 13, 2013 at 08:24 PM.