That's my understanding as well . The court/judge can ask to hear and or review the case . They have the option to ask all party"s to respond or they can just review the case with out asking for anything else from either party .
The thing that gets me is the AG was denied the ability to intervene and yet she can still intervene by asking for even more appeals . Seems odd to me why ask to intervene . If granted she was going to ask for en banc anyway , It seems like a waisted step . I assume it's just something she had to do first .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !
I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
|