The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - DHS Drones to determine if person is armed and to intercept cell phone signals

dajowi · March 7, 2013, 04:11 PM

In KYLLO v. UNITED STATES ( No. 99-8508 ) I think it can be said that what does and doesn't fall under a fourth amendment protection can be so convoluted as to be almost impossible to determine.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/99-8508

When you think about it, it appears that our bill of rights as guaranteed under the constitution can be subject to reinterpretation under future supreme court rulings and nothing is guaranteed.

March 7, 2013, 04:11 PM	#36
dajowi Senior Member Join Date: November 2, 2005 Posts: 1,196	In KYLLO v. UNITED STATES ( No. 99-8508 ) I think it can be said that what does and doesn't fall under a fourth amendment protection can be so convoluted as to be almost impossible to determine. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/99-8508 When you think about it, it appears that our bill of rights as guaranteed under the constitution can be subject to reinterpretation under future supreme court rulings and nothing is guaranteed.