Quote:
i saw the video in question. you can't see the robber on the ground because the counter's in the way, and you can only see the pharmacist shooting him. how do we know the robber wasn't still a threat pointing a gun at him while lying on the ground?
i say give the hard working business owner the benefit of the doubt, rather than the scumbag robber.
|
I saw a video of a press conference with one of the prosecuting attorneys in this case. I think it was the lead DA for the city.
He specifically said that based on the evidence of how the 16 year old was laying on the ground they determined that he was not moving and couldn't have been a threat. Something about "palms up" and other details that I can't remember.