View Single Post
Old November 23, 2008, 08:00 AM   #74
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,714
Quote:
2. He was tracking a wounded animal, maybe outside of his hunting area. How would you handle this?
Interesting, if you don't have the facts, then how do you know he was tracking a wounded animal?

FYI, it isn't the tracking that was the problem. It was the shooting. He may have been tracking a wounded animal and got in a position to shoot it, but he obviously didn't know what was beyond the animal (assuming innocence here). The simple point of the matter is that he should not have taken the shot.

He buggered his first shot and completely screwed up on his second shot. Wow.

Quote:
If you haven't noticed by now, I have no confidence in the reporting of facts in our media. Is this guy guilty of second degree manslaughter? I do not know as I again say, I DO NOT HAVE THE FACTS. Do you?
Any yet you keep arguing for only specific "facts" you claim you don't have and don't trust. How convenient.

You are playing both sides of the fence and that doesn't jive very well.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02827 seconds with 8 queries