I'm not sure what side of the bed you woke up on today RC20...
Seems like offense is being taken where none was meant and that we're running around the semantics game here.
Uncle Malice said he didn't think the SP2022 was of the same "quality" of the Glock. Most of us understood him to say that he simply prefers the Glock to his experience with the SP2022.
You took offense at this and lambasted him and then later went onto say:
Quote:
|
I would use the terms Functional and Reliable for Glock, not qulaity
|
Ok for you to say it but not for him? You then go onto say that your definition of quality
Quote:
|
is something that feels good as well as the other attributes.
|
We can accept that. Why could you not accept the same definition from Uncle Malace?
The SP2022 works for some folks and I don't begrudge them or you this. But I'm one of those who felt that almost every other pistol in it's class outperformed the SIG - didn't 'feel" great to me nor did it perform in a remarkable way for me. Gonna have to leave me out of the "almost all reports"
