View Single Post
Old July 12, 2013, 09:10 PM   #608
Al Norris
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
Here's where we stand at the end of today:
  • 07-09-2013 - Madigan files an MTD, doc #73, on jurisdiction grounds (case is moot).
  • 07-10-2013 - Plaintiffs file a response to the MTD, #74. Plaintiffs then file a motion for misc. relief, #75, and an expedited hearing, #76.
  • 07-11-2013 - State Defendants respond to Plaintiffs motions, #77.
  • 07-12-2013 - Sheriff Livesay files an MTD, #78, using the same reasoning as the State. Plaintiffs immediately respond, #79. The Court issues an order, #80, to brief on 2 specific questions (see thread). All responses due by NOON on the 18th of July.

The referenced documents can be found at the docket on the Internet Archive.

Of note is what Judge Stiehl has ordered. After briefly stating what has happened in the last few days, the judge then writes:

Quote:
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties leave to file an additional brief addressing the following issues ONLY:

A. Whether the Court retains subject matter jurisdiction in light of the passage of the Firearm Concealed Carry Act? and/or,

B. Whether any challenges to the constitutionality of the 2013 Firearm Concealed Carry Act must be raised in a separate lawsuit?

Any party which desires to file a brief on this matter shall do so on or before Noon, July 18, 2013.
So by next Thursday, we will know more about where this all stands.
Al Norris is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03182 seconds with 8 queries