View Single Post
Old September 15, 2012, 09:49 AM   #18
JC57
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2010
Posts: 375
I have a 70s era S&W model 49 "Bodyguard" all-steel, J-frame, shrouded hammer. I also have a new, lighter, alloy-framed 642 DAO J-frame.

The new gun is lighter, has better sights, and is rated for +P ammo while the older one is not. The 642 is comfortable for pocket carry while the 49 is a noticeably heavier chunk of iron.

So you define "better". The 49 sits at home, the 642 goes with me.

Regarding autos - I used to carry a S&W 5649 DAO all-stainless steel double-stack 9mm as a duty weapon. It was OK in a service holster on a full-size 2 1/2" duty belt, balanced as it was with the ammo pouches, handcuffs, and radio on the same belt.

However, these days (as civilian) I'd sure rather be carrying something like the M&P or Shield. There's probably a reason that police departments switched over to the newer, lighter-weight guns. And don't claim cost - I know of several departments that traded in those S&W 5946s and now carry Sigs.

So yes, in some cases the newer, slimmer, lighter models ARE better than the old ones.

That being said, I have a fondness for 70s-era S&W revolvers and would prefer to carry a Model 66 4" over everything else, if I could figure out a way to conceal it well.
JC57 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02277 seconds with 8 queries