The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - Opinions of the Kel-Tec P32

wild cat mccane · November 25, 2020, 12:50 PM

The LCP was out for a while before the recall. Years?

I think the LCPII isn’t bought as much as we might think. It’s extremely wide for a pocket 380. Widest of all options. Meh.

Has nothing to do with redundant safeties. The LCP I carry doesn’t have 2. Recall, Kel Tec designed their p32 safety based on hammer sprung percent and weight of the gun. My concern on the lcpII has to do with the travel of the spring to be sprung to hit a primer. I personally don’t thing the ruger lcpII dingus is good enough on a fully sprung hammer spring.

November 25, 2020, 12:50 PM	#99
wild cat mccane Senior Member Join Date: May 22, 2011 Posts: 3,626	The LCP was out for a while before the recall. Years? I think the LCPII isn’t bought as much as we might think. It’s extremely wide for a pocket 380. Widest of all options. Meh. Has nothing to do with redundant safeties. The LCP I carry doesn’t have 2. Recall, Kel Tec designed their p32 safety based on hammer sprung percent and weight of the gun. My concern on the lcpII has to do with the travel of the spring to be sprung to hit a primer. I personally don’t thing the ruger lcpII dingus is good enough on a fully sprung hammer spring.