The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

crashm1 · April 27, 2009, 10:28 PM

I'm okay with banning pipe bombs, personally owned artillery pieces and WMDs for the most part. I figure if I really need one we're to the point that I won't feel to bad about stealing the necessary item.
As far as the actual subject at hand goes I think going after the Roberti Roos gun ban ought to be first. It's the most heinous and has the most people affected by it in California. I also tend to think from the way the 9th ruled for incorporation and some of the language in the ruling that it should be fairly easy to get a good outcome.

April 27, 2009, 10:28 PM	#13
crashm1 Senior Member Join Date: July 21, 2007 Location: Western,WI Posts: 243	I'm okay with banning pipe bombs, personally owned artillery pieces and WMDs for the most part. I figure if I really need one we're to the point that I won't feel to bad about stealing the necessary item. As far as the actual subject at hand goes I think going after the Roberti Roos gun ban ought to be first. It's the most heinous and has the most people affected by it in California. I also tend to think from the way the 9th ruled for incorporation and some of the language in the ruling that it should be fairly easy to get a good outcome. __________________ Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. - George Washington 1911s and V-twin sport bikes make me happy.