The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

MLeake · February 1, 2013, 07:14 AM

I had an LCR. I liked the smoothness of the trigger action, but did not like the way the trigger itself seemed to bite my trigger finger.

Now, I have a 442. I did put slightly larger grips on the 442, but I have never had an issue with blistering or cutting my trigger finger like I did with the LCR.

Edit: I am noticeably more accurate with the 442; I suspect this is because I don't get distracted by the thought that shooting it might hurt, which is what would happen when shooting the LCR.

February 1, 2013, 07:14 AM	#8
MLeake Senior Member Join Date: November 15, 2007 Location: Outside KC, MO Posts: 10,128	I had an LCR. I liked the smoothness of the trigger action, but did not like the way the trigger itself seemed to bite my trigger finger. Now, I have a 442. I did put slightly larger grips on the 442, but I have never had an issue with blistering or cutting my trigger finger like I did with the LCR. Edit: I am noticeably more accurate with the 442; I suspect this is because I don't get distracted by the thought that shooting it might hurt, which is what would happen when shooting the LCR.