why isnt the .45 SWC a popular defensive round?
I was taught that a disruptive wound channel that quickly causes traumatic blood loss is the ideal in defensive ammunition.
When you use slow moving ball ammo like a .45, the wound channel is not as disruptive as with something that would tear better like a swc/wc or hollow point.
along that reasoning why isnt the swc or wc more popular? Im sure theres something Im missing, please post your thoughts.
To clarify--this post came about because everyone seems to recommend either hollowpoint or ball ammo for a .45, nothing in between.
Last edited by MikeGoob; November 28, 2009 at 01:49 PM.
|