I think you're over thinking this. Do you have some case precedent of a jury convicting someone because they had a laser or light on their gun? All it would take is a half way decent expert witness to explain that lasers and lights are a very popular and common accessory to defeat that argument. There are plenty of dumb things you can do to affect your perception to the jury but having a laser or light isn't one of them.
There are good arguments not to use a laser, but the jury perception one simply isn't anything to be concerned with.
|